Reckless Driving Lawyers Loudoun Virginia

Lawyer - Virginia Reckless Driving

As per Va. Code § 46.2-852, the general rule for reckless driving is defined as, irrespective of the maximum speeds permitted by law, any person who drives a vehicle on any highway recklessly or at a speed or in a manner so as to endanger the life, limb, or property of any person shall be guilty of reckless driving.

Below is a sample case of reckless driving in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with Reckless Driving in Virginia and you are wondering what the penalty is in VA?

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged with Reckless Driving in Virginia?

For a lot of our clients, a charge of Reckless Driving can result in the loss of their job, their security clearance, etc.

Don’t risk going to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of Reckless Driving in Virginia.

If you have been charged with a criminal offense of Reckless Driving in Virginia and you are wondering what the penalty is in VA, contact our law firm for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Criminal Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. The lawyers in our law firm have the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Lazarus v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant in Loudoun was speeding, and he did not pull over when he was pursued by a police officer. Defendant was in an accident, and the officer asked him what caused it. Defendant admitted that he was speeding. Defendant was convicted of eluding the police. On appeal, defendant claimed that his statement was in violation of his Miranda rights and the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress. The court affirmed the conviction and held that defendant was not in custody at the time that he made his statement. The officer detained defendant as a necessary protective measure. Defendant was questioned as the driver of a vehicle involved in a traffic accident, not as a criminal suspect. Defendant was barred from arguing that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on reckless or improper driving because he did not ask for the instruction.

If you are facing a traffic case in Loudoun Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

• Miranda warnings are required whenever a suspect is subject to "custodial interrogation." Not every detention constitutes "custody" for purposes of Miranda. Rather, a person is in "custody" once there is a formal arrest or restraint on freedom of movement of the degree associated with a formal arrest. Whether a detention amounts to a custodial interrogation for purposes of Miranda depends on all of the circumstances surrounding the detention. Miranda does not apply to a police officer's "general questioning" in the course of the fact-finding process. Neither the location of the interrogation nor the use of protective measures by police officers for their safety and security will necessarily give rise to a finding that the environment is custodial in nature.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. The lawyers in our law firm have the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.


These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.